Powered By Pop Culture

Entries tagged as ‘Television’

Television’s Anti-Heroes

October 6, 2009 · 1 Comment

These days, we as an audience are appearing less and less interested in characters that play by the rules and follow a moral compass.  Back in the television days of yore, we weren’t allowed to have dramatic leads that didn’t follow the letter of the law and show us that doing what was right should be done the right way.  Perry Mason, Jim Rockford, Thomas Magnum, Joe Friday, MacGyver, and Ben Matlock are just a few of the classic icons that we as an audience came to love growing up (whether in release or in reruns).  Nowadays, though, the landscape is… a little different.

Currently, the shows that seem to draw renewals from networks and scores of viewers are the procedurals and whatnot.  We have our CSIs and our Law and Orders and they still keep churning out millions of viewers and millions of dollars.  Those kind of concepts always will.  But take a look at the other protagonists who are fighting for truth, justice, and Nielsen ratings.

house_md_poster4Dr. Greg House, MD:  He lies, he cheats, he pops pills and he risks lives all in the pursuit of being right.  But not being right in the moral and virtuous sense.  House just lives to be correct and manipulate people as if they were dancing to his tune.  They’ve made many attempts over the seasons to humanize the character and dull his edge, but at the end of the day House will always be House.  Hugh Laurie’s charming misanthrope will insult the strong and antagonize the weak, just to prove that everybody lies.  Even when you’ve just recovered from nearly dying of a crazy combination of once in a lifetime symptoms, House doesn’t shake your hand or tell you he’s glad you’re okay.  He mocks you and tells you to not be stupid again.  He’ll go over the spouse’s head, lie to the administration, and kidnap a patient.

dexter_posterDexter Morgan:  A serial killer who’s on our side.  Not sure if that’s as comforting as it’s supposed to sound, but it seems to work. The show is starting its fourth season of Dexter killing killers and then ritualistically carving up the bodies all the while providing his extremely creepy narration thanks to Michael C. Hall’s eerie intonation.  Dexter spends his time faking a personality he can use to get by his job as a forensic police scientist and a husband, but as he himself will tell you, it’s all just hiding his “dark passenger” who is constantly itching to get out and kill.  The only thing keeping Dexter on our side is his code of protecting the innocent and punishing the guilty set forth by his adopted father, a cop who saw Dexter’s impulses from an early age.  Even when Dexter thinks he’s found an ally in his cause in the form of another dark killer, he always realizes that without this code, anyone would succumb to the dark passanger.  Frankly, in terms of role models, I guess you can’t do much better than a sociopath who hunts the guilty.

mentalist_ver2Patrick Jane:  The Mentalist is a procedural that seems like it’s going to be pretty run of the mill.  A team of federal agents who work for the fictional California Bureau of Investigation solving high profile murders and kidnappings all over the great state of, well, California are aided by a former television psychic.  The psychic, Patrick Jane, was using techniques of the mentalist trade to dupe audiences and convince them he could speak with the dead and read their minds.  When a serial killer known as Red John showed up, Jane tried to curry ratings by “aiding” the investigations.  Red John killed his family out of sport.  Jane and the members of CBI take on the usual “case-of-the-week” and usually catch the bad guy, but the methods that Jane employs almost always break the rules of institution.  Like House, he’ll do whatever is necessary to solve a case and he isn’t doing it for justice since like Dexter, Jane is also a borderline sociopath thanks to the death of his family.  If the case happens to have anything to do with Red John?  Then you’d better get out of his way.  Instead of playing him in a dark brooding fashion, Simon Baker makes Jane charming, smirking rogue.  An interesting choice that pulls off the sociopath angle very well.

the_shield_season_6_posterDetective Vic Mackey:  ”Mackey is Al Capone with a badge.”  With these words, you get everything you need to know about the character that Michael Chiklis played for seven seasons on The Shield, a gritty cop show that was loosely based on the actions of the infamous LAPD Rampart squad.  Mackey is an intense individual with a corrupted system of justice and morality that has him doing whatever it takes to enact justice while defending the interests of his family and partners.  This includes stealing from street gangs, providing protection for mobsters, and even killing fellow cops who have turned informant.  Mackey is a monster in the eyes of some, but the point to keep in mind is that he’ll also do whatever it takes to take down the worst of the worst in Los Angeles’ Farmington District.  He may not seem like he has any scruples, but there are moments where Chiklis shows that the character has a code of honor and will break whatever laws stand in the way of him taking down those responsible for violating that code.

l35ffd15c0001_1_15495Jack Bauer:  There are those that argue that Kiefer Sutherland’s protagonist from the hit action series, 24, is a shill for the Republican administration’s theories of “international relations” in terms of terrorists.  For a majority of the seasons, this is hard to ignore what with any character who was an Arab incidentally turning out to be a villain and Bauer torturing everyone (including his own brother) in the pursuit of trying to stop a terrorist threat.  Season 7 was, in my opinion, a great return to form for Bauer as he was forced to face the consequences of his actions and attempt to defend the nation against threats without resorting to old methods and old paranoia.  While Bauer kills, detonates, interrogates and, yes, tortures his way through seven seasons of action, his results can’t be denied as he will sacrifice his own life and safety if it means innocents go free and bad guys get the shaft.

There aren’t “good guys” anymore fighting the forces of evil out there.  They’re all anti-heroes, these days.  Somewhere along the line the only way to make a character interesting was to inject a little bit of evil in them.  You can’t argue the results haven’t been entertaining seeing as how these five characters have topped the charts in critics and viewers lists for years.  Whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing remains to be seen.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

TV Shows -> DVD: The Big Bang Theory

September 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Season-2-Promo-Pic-the-big-bang-theory-2847657-2500-1667Whenever you ask a nerd or geek or dork what they think of the Big Bang Theory, there’s usually an uneasiness that washes over their face.  See, there’s a problem with this show:  It’s degrading to the nerd set by perpetuating the stereotypes about that particular class of sci-fi obsessing, comic book loving, video game enthralled bunch as the being virgins and losers.  It’s also a damn funny sitcom.

If you haven’t seen the show yet (and based on its ratings, that can’t be possible), the premise involves two genius nerds, Leonard and Sheldon, who live together in an apartment building.  Across the hall from them is Penny, a struggling actress who’s unlucky at love and slowly over 13 season one episodes, she becomes part of the wayward nerds’ social group (much to the joy of lovelorn Leonard who pines for the plucky blonde).  Leonard and Sheldon have an extremely small clique of friends that includes the horn-dog engineer Wolowitz and the incapable of speaking to women, Koothrappali.  Both of these characters are constantly referred to by their ethnicities/cultural backgrounds in jokes about them being Jewish and Hindu, respectively, but again the jokes are so innocent and the humor seems so genuine, you feel you can laugh without guilt.

Season One is only a scant 13 episodes that sets up the general atmosphere of the show pretty well.  The characters all come into their own over some very episodic, but not contrived, storylines that give us a window into just exactly who these people are and how the humor of their interactions can be developed.  While Season One shows off the basic character interactions and hammering out the back-and-forth of the humor, Season Two took those building blocks and created scenarios where what was teasted as the funniest parts of Season One and expanded on them for whole episodes.  Things like Sheldon’s borderline Aspirger’s syndrome breakdowns, Koothrappali’s inability to talk to women unless drunk, what would happen if Wolowitz’s actually got laid, and having Penny cross to the dark side and actually become interested in an online Age of Conan game.  With the second DVD set having a total of 22 episodes, you’d think this would get old, but that’s where veteran producer Chuck Lorre (creator of the wildly successful Two and a Half Men) knows his skills in sitcom construction.  Each episode works just fine on its own and can be enjoyed by a layman just jumping onboard in their first viewing.  That’s the mark of sound television writing in terms of being able to draw in new fans: keep it simple and keep it accessible.  Co-creator Bill Prady has talked about how the characters are based on actual people he’d encountered in college and you can see the quirks mixing with the parts of the characters to make them actually three-dimensional and that helps them remain likeable.  Penny is more than just a sweet ditz, Wolowitz is more than just a horny jerk, and Leonard is more than just a lovesick puppy genius.

The show is back for Season 3 and it’s extremely easy to catch up on what’s going on since there’s no complicated ongoing narrative with the exception of the basic dynamics that are easily identified on a first viewing.  I suggest it’s still a great idea to dive into the DVDs and get acquainted, but if you don’t have the dedication, then I pity you and wish you luck with your life and lack of achievments.  Below is a trailer of Season Two that shows off some highlights.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

TV Shows -> DVD: Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip

May 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment

about_photo

Sometimes something can be too good.  A perfect cast, a perfect writing team, a perfect timeslot, and perfect showrunners would lead someone expect unbridled success for a television show.  In the case of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, it meant, what some considered, an unmitigated disaster.   In 2006, Aaron Sorkin was making his triumphant return to television.  After his previous venture, the West Wing, had wrapped its final season (albeit without him or partner Thomas Schlame since they had departed from the show in 2003).  NBC was frantically looking for their next big tentpole show.  Sorkin had spent his time apart from working on the West Wing developing many new properties for theater and television and the one he most wanted to work on followed the behind-the-scene drama of running a late-night comedy show.  NBC was intrigued and approved the commission of a pilot.  Casting was announced with Bradley Whitford (a veteren of Sorkin’s the West Wing), Matthew Perry (who played Chandler Bing on Friends), Amanda Peet, Timothy Busfield, Steven Webber, and D.L. Hughley.  Initaial hopes for the show were extremely high and the series was greenlit upon postive response to the well-crafted pilot episode.   Critics, though, were slightly apprehensive about the show.  Sorkin had a great deal riding on this, his third television effort (the dramedy Sports Night on ABC had preceded West Wing on television), and the pressure to have an instant success was most likely the number one killer of the show.  The public’s expectations were never going to be met and the constant comparisons to Sorkin’s other work were inevitable.  The show was pulled mid season and was not renewed for a second order.

This is an extremely unfortunate turn of events because there is really nothing wrong with Studio 60.  It’s actually a great show.  Sorkin is known for creating compelling and charming characters and delivering winning dialogue for them to recite and Schlame can set up an episode’s look and feel to be almost cinema-worthy.  It does become evident over the course of the season that a powerplay between the showrunners and the network was brewing.  Stories felt less logical, subplots felt forced, and the trajectory of the show started to slide, but viewers who stuck with it could still feel Sorkin’s hands attempting to keep his characters alive, but the ship had sailed.  NBC dropped the last batch of episodes for final viewing with no fanfare and wrapped the show swiftly with the showrunners trying to satisfy as many lingering threads as they could.

This leaves us with a complete series of episodes following some winning characters, some intriguing stories, and some misfire attempts at perfection.  In a sense, that’s an apt description for everyday life, can’t it?  Give this series a shot and see for yourself.  I don’t expect everyone to enjoy it, but I do expect people to smile at least once.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Carved in Stone: Jesse Stone TV-Movies and Why I’m Addicted to Them

April 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

jesse-stoneWhen I was a kid, I was a huge fan of Magnum P.I. Since I was 5 years old, I was glued to the TV watching Thomas Magnum solve cases and get in and out of trouble all over Hawaiian with his stalwart sidekicks and his badass Ferrari.  Times change, though.  While I do own one or two boxsets of seasons of the show and I’ll always stop to watch an episode if it’s on TV, you could say that eventually I want more from my protagonists and their stories.   This is where the Jesse Stone series of TV-movies comes in.  An interesting sidenote:  Around the time I was into Magnum P.I., another show began to become a popular favorite on TV:  Spencer For Hire based on the books by Robert B. Parker.   The series another private investigator (this one based in Boston) and was played by Robert Urich in the TV show.  Parker is an excellent novelist and that resonated extremely well in the adaptation that was broadcast for a brief three seasons on ABC.  So here we are in 2009 and Parker has moved on to a new character for a series of novels, Jesse Stone.  Stone is a former LAPD cop who is fired for being drunk on duty and is miraculously offered a job in the small New England town of Paradise as their new Chief of Police.  Paradise is not the sleepy town it appears, though, and while Stone’s new life sounds like it should be quiet and uneventful, he becomes involved in mob killings, cold case murder mysteries, and serial killers on holiday.  The show is nowhere near “fast-paced” and is heavily dialogue based.  In a nod to my childhood (and how this drawn out narrative comes together), Tom Selleck of Magnum P.I. is cast as Jesse Stone.  Selleck plays Stone as a quiet, broken man who has many attributes of a capable lawman but swims in booze and regret.  The compelling aspect of Stone comes in this flawed nature where if he’s not on a case, he’s drinking too much and regretting his failed marriage and lost career.  The dialogue is crisp, the plots written very tight, and the casting of supporting characters with actors such as William DeVane and Kathy Baker makes this more than a guilty pleasure and definitely great television.

untitled

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,

Cable TV vs. Network TV

March 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

leveragejpgI really never thought I’d see the day.  Like, I seriously didn’t.  What day?  The day when an original show on a basic cable channel was declared a ratings success while network programming viewership shrank so vastly that Jeff Zucker, President and CEO of NBC television, declared that the network he lorded over would never be #1 in primetime again.   With almost every new program released in the last two seasons on major network television “on the bubble” (meaning it’s almost 50/50 if they’ll be renewed for another season), cable has swooped in to take the lead in original content.  What started with a small healthy pedigree of shows on various cable networks (Nip/Tuck, Monk, The Dead Zone, The Shield, etc.) has now grown to such proportions that you’re not a major cable network if you’re not producing your own original programming.  Battlestar Gallactica and Stargate: SG-1 both drew in fans to the Sci-Fi Channel.  USA Network grew their stable from Monk and the Dead Zone to Psych, In Plain Sight, and Burn Notice.  TNT’s experiment with the Closer paid off so well that they now have huge names headlining their shows including Saving Grace, Trust Me, and Leverage.  Last, but surely not least, AMC, a channel no one really thought would try to enter into this arena, has not one but two sophomore success stories with Breaking Bad and Mad Men and both not only drew record ratings but awards for their cast and crews.  All of this is occurring while NBC has canceled or is suspected to cancel almost all of its newest crop of shows.  Life, Chuck, Knight Rider, My Own Worst Enemy, and Heroes all underperformed this season with Knight Rider and My Own Worst Enemy canceled, Life and Chuck on the bubble and Heroes, while renewed, will go under the knife for retooling for a third time in three seasons.  CBS has had one break out hit in their drama catergory, the Mentalist, and successful new sitcom, the Big Bang Theory.  ABC… well… Don’t ask.  Fox is currently beating NBC in ratings even though Dollhouse and Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, both relegated to the graveyard that is Friday nights, are both most likely doomed after this season.  The networks breakout show this season, Fringe, scores well but cost a fortune to produce.

burn_notice-1jpgSo what is cable’s secret?  Frankly, they’re following the British model for programming.  The seasons of cable television programs are shorter than network shows with 12-13 episodes a season being much cheaper to produce and thus allowing the budget to be focussed on production values, quality casts, and even marketing.  Also, these shorter seasons allow for faster production time where there’s less downtime between seasons to lose your audience.  The concepts are also simpler for mainstream audiences.  Leverage and Burn Notice both owe their simple premises to 80′s classics like the A-Team and MacGyver while Psych and Monk both hail from the classic detective model that was made popular by Magnum P.I. and Simon & Simon.   For the fans of the Sopranos and Dexter, both Breaking Bad and Mad Men offer more stronger writing and more complex storylines while pushing the boundaries of standards and practices.

Suffice it to say, as network TV begins to lose the race for quality and successful programming, cable seems to be picking up the slack to record returns and quality hits.  With NBC effectively eliminating 10pm primetime programming next season (and replacing it with a nightly Jay Leno show), cable is about to pick up even more viewers looking for an alternative.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

TV Shows -> DVD: The State Within

March 25, 2009 · Leave a Comment

the_state_within_dvd__large_jpg2Every so often, I come across an actor that I think is way too talented for the work I’ve found them in.  Jason Isaacs was someone I first saw in Armageddon way back when.  He played the NASA scientist who figures out how to stop the asteroid and has one of the best lines in the whole movie: “I know the presidents’ chief scientific advisor, we were at MIT together. And, in a situation like this, you-you really don’t wanna take the advice from a man who got a C minus in astrophysics. The presidents’ advisors are… wrong. I’m right.”  The man just oozed smarmy badass-ness.  Slowly, I waited for him to pop up in better more meaty parts, but alas he wound up as villains in Harry Potter and The Patriot, never really getting a chance to show off how an intelligent, yet realistic, protagonist could be played well.  You can imagine how happy I was to discover the BBC miniseries, The State Within.

The series follows Sir Mark Brydon, British Ambassador to the United States, during his last week in the position.  As he is wrapping up the final duties of the office, a terrorist attack on a British airline on US soil sends the country into a panic.  Brydon and British Counsellor External Affairs, Nicholas Brokelhurst, both begin to investigate the true purpose behind the attack and its connection to the Secretary of Defense Lynne Warner and her ties to former Haliburton-esque company, Armitage.

If you’re a fan of 24, then you’re already well-aware of construction of the plot of this series: a terrorist attack (or threat of terrorist attack) sets into motion a series of events involving multiple characters and conspiracies in the highest corridors of power with one man leading the charge to save the day.  Now here’s the rub: The State Within takes this tired formula that could have been used for any countlessly pointless seasons of 24 and not only compresses it to 6 episodes (thus saving on needless plot threads), but also makes every character believable and interesting.  I recommend this series to anyone that wants a little intelligence with their political action thrillers and some surprising twists on classic characters.  Now if only we could have something like this produced in the US…

image1

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Serenity: You can’t take the sky from me…

October 16, 2005 · Leave a Comment


So I haven’t made many updates due to a little distraction. Actually, not too little. We’re talking about a big damn movie that should never have gotten made, but bucking the law of averages, there it was; larger than life and twice as amazing. I am, of course, talking about “Serenity,” the Firefly movie.

First, some backstory: When I served my purgatory that was Best Buy, I met a man named Lawrence, a self-professed “Whedonite.” What the hell’s a “Whedonite”? They’re someone who loves writer/director/television-show-creator Joss Whedon of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel. Now, Lawrence was also preaching about some new show that had just been released on DVD called “Firefly” and how it was sad that it’d gotten pulled from the air. I looked at the box and read the back, but saw nothing that really struck me as truly amazing or ground-breaking. At this point, I wasn’t even a fan of the man. Lawrence made me a deal, though. Since he was waiting on a paycheck and couldn’t by the set, he told me to buy it. If I didn’t like it, he’d buy it back at the standard retail price and I’d make about fifteen dollars on the whole deal. “What if I want to keep it?” I asked. He smiled, “Then I win.” Suffice it to say, I still own a rather worn and loved “Firefly” DVD set that has since been loaned out multiple times over the last two years. During those two years, I was a cult leader akin to Charles Manson, enlisting disciple after disciple in the religion of “Firefly” until every one of my close friends all owned copies of the series and we all waited patiently for the rumor to come true: There was going to be a “Firefly” movie.

Whedon put a part of himself into creating this show and when it was canceled, he was beyond scarred. The thing is, it’s hard to keep a good idea or a good idea man down and through a little bit of fan support in pushing the DVD numbers through the roof and a rival studio of the company that produced the series looking for a new property, Whedon got his greenlight. This became “Serenity.”


“Serenity” follows the cast of “Firefly,” Captain Malcolm Reynolds, his first mate Zoe, their pilot Wash, engineer Kaylee, and mercenary muscle Jayne as they protect a young doctor, Simon, and his psychic, River. Set in the far future, where civilization has grown so advanced that the lower-castes actually resemble the old west, the crew of the transport, Serenity, scour the system for jobs, legal or otherwise. When they offer to protect the young Simon and River from the allied government who are chasing them for unknown reasons, they bring on a world of hurt for very little profit, but a cause worth fighting for.

The message of “Serenity” is not one of action and adventure. It’s one of belief and what you’re willing to do fight for what you believe in. The Alliance has sent an Operative to kill River and whoever stands in his way. This Operative believes in the dream of a perfect world promised by the Alliance. Throughout the film, every character is forced to face their own beliefs, most of all the Captain. Malcolm lost his faith in God during a vicious war that his side ultimately lost. Since then, he’s been a hard man of very confused principles, silently searching for something, anything, to believe in and fight for. To him, without him actually knowing it, defending River from the hands of the Alliance IS that belief that he’s been missing. The moment in the film when he’s forced to face it… “I am to misbehave.” There are moments in movies where someone can feel the room actually shake with the realization that a character is actually going to do whatever it takes to fight for what they think is right. That scene is one of them.

Now, I’m a fan of the show. That is beyond obvious. I loved “Firefly” and was so passionate that I enthralled others to be just as in love as I was. The thing is that I actually brought other people to this movie, non-fans, who had never seen the show nor were total sci-fi fans. Indie movie lovers, action movie junkies, and people just out to see something different. They all loved it. Once again, my DVD box set is making its rounds with a whole new group of people.

“Serenity” is a film built on winning dialogue, fun characters, great action, and a pre-battle speech that we can sum up the movie in one monologue: “Y’all got on this boat for different reasons, but y’all comin’ to the same place. So now I’m asking more of you than I have before. Maybe everything. Sure as I know anything, I know this: In a year or maybe ten, perhaps even on this very ground, they’ll swing back to the belief that they can make people better; and I don’t hold to that. I aim to misbehave.”

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

TV Guide Be Damned

September 23, 2005 · Leave a Comment


Every season there’s a show that hits it big. Said show proceeds to spawn clones of the hit formula and then subsequently creates a sub genre of television based around said formula. The most current example of this is the new “we’ve-run-out-of-original-ideas” concept of the “Procedural” spawned by the success of CBS’s “C.S.I.” program and its cardboard cut-out spin-offs.

The point is, that there is a constant argument regarding nothing being good on television anymore. I agree with that statement wholeheartedly, but also mention that everything is open to debate about the quality of entertainment versus one’s tastes and guilty pleasures {see previous post re: the “O.C.”}.

Consistently, though, there have been voices on television that seem to capture an audience and create a following akin to cult-like status. These creators don’t get copy-cat programs because rarely do the shows they voice become break-out hits which can be copied and recast to have similar successes. The three voices that I single out as a trinity of modern television are Joss Whedon, Aaron Sorkin, and Bill Lawrence.


Now, we’ll start with the lesser known of these this trifecta: Bill Lawrence of “Scrubs.” He represents the sitcom aspect the trinity. For those who’ve never seen the show, “Scrubs” follows three medical interns as they face the challenges and trials that await them as full-fledged doctors. The show is told from the perspective of the main character, J.D., who provides a voice-over and sets the tone for many of the comedic and dramatic scenes of the show. Throughout the show, J.D.’s daydreams about the situation are intercut with the scenes. There’s no laugh track and no live audience. There are no cardboard sets and 3/4 open stage shots. The whole show is filmed in a decommissioned hospital and filmed with the one camera method allowing for maximum mobility of point-of-view. Lawrence infuses his characters with equal parts physical comedy and warmth of character. Each episode can be about something tragic or hilarious, and be tempered with enough levity or drama to make it resonate for the simple twenty minutes of programming that it delivers to its audience.


While Lawrence has cornered the market for a unique voice in sitcoms, Aaron Sorkin has brought a new voice to the drama. While one of his most well known works has been the highly successful political series, the “West Wing,” his previous work on the dramedy, “Sports Night” set a tone for what he and his team of writers and directors can bring to a show. Many would characterize “Sports Night” as a sitcom, but the fact is, its lack of laughtrack, studio audience and situational comedy in general, move it into the same realm as the “West Wing”: a dramatic show with a great sense of humor. This seems to be Sorkin’s gift and is definitely carried over from his playwriting career. The back-and-forth banter, harsh emotional struggles, and ability to walk the tightrope between heart-wrenching monologue and ear-piercing melodrama are all skills learned on the stage and Sorkin manages to carry them with a professional demeanor and stride. While he may have broken new ground with the West Wing’s immaculate writing, he has since dropped out of the spotlight after being fired from the show he helped create. Without a doubt, whatever his next project, whenever it will be, Sorkin will continue to a talented and ground-breaking voice in television.


Finally, and I say finally because getting to this point takes a great deal of steeling myself for inevitable backlash, we have Joss Whedon. While widely known as the man who gave Sarah Michelle Gellar a career, Joss Whedon has been a writer in the television and media scene for the majority of his adult life. From staff-writing gigs on Roseanne to script-doctoring such movies as Speed and X-Men, Whedon’s trademark quips and dialogue can be found peppered throughout the industry. When the WB wanted something different for their fledgling network, Joss dug up his original ideas for what became the “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” feature film (don’t be weirded out if you don’t remember it. It starred Luke Perry) and spun a franchise that included merchandise, a spin-off show (“Angel” starring Buffy’s vampire ex-boyfriend) and even comics. A tour-de-force in sci-fi, Whedon even tried to create an unrelated show for Fox, the cult-favorite “Firefly” and its feature film “Serenity,” but his fame will always lie with the little girl with a destiny. In essence, besides Whedon’s brand for catchy banter and wisecracks (and even in some cases, musical numbers), all of his shows are about heroes and what it truly takes to be one in whatever fictional landscape he constructs. The most intriguing part of said landscape has always been his thinly-veiled metaphors for what they represent. In “Buffy,” we learned that high school can be Hell, literally. “Angel” showed us how our finding the path to being an adult and our place in this world can be torture. “Firefly” was his crowning opus that illustrated that just surviving every day in this world takes grit and heart. The following are lines from each of Whedon’s three series that can illustrate how just a few sentences are able to show the emotive core of what makes good television: “Buffy” – “The hardest thing in this world is to live in it.” “Angel” – “Heroes don’t accept the world the way it is. They fight it. “Firefly” – “We have done the impossible and that makes us mighty.”

Three voices of television that have, whether subtly or drastically, changed the standards of what makes good, well done entertainment. Thee voices whose names will always be synonymous with quality and inspiration. Three voices that a little glowing box will always need, despite what TV Guide may tell you.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

How I learned to stop worrying and love the O.C.

September 8, 2005 · Leave a Comment

I can vividly recall the exact circumstances that led me to tune into the primetime soap experience titled, the “O.C.” It was almost a year ago and I was reading a blog by Heidi McDonald, a comic book editor and commentator. Since apparently the show contained constant and slightly positive references to comic books, McDonald had started to run weekly columns reviewing the show.

The prospect of mainstream exposure for something that had always been a closet passion of mine slightly intrigued me. Also, subsequent information that one of the primary “O.C.” writers was going to be involved in some upcoming comic titles that I was interested in reading continued to pique my interest. Thus, I decided to give the show a look. If for no other reason than just to know what the current pop culture impression of a “fanboy” was. Fortunately for me, my good friend, Kelly [see previous posts] was something of an “O.C.” fanatic. Kelly knew the first season inside and out and had been following the second season religiously (right down to “Fight Club”-style rules of watching the show in her presence). Having someone who was up to date on subplots and characters was going to be a bonus. This, I thought, would allow me to study the show for my curiosity and not get lost in the myriad of melodramatic plot developments.

That night’s particular episode was actually going to be about three of the characters trying to sell their own comic book idea to a major (and legitimate) comic book publisher. Elsewhere on the show, two other characters were breaking up while two female characters were hooking up. This is where Kelly was a big help. I had no idea what the hell was going on. From just the observations of a first-time viewer, The “O.C.” was a cardboard cut-out teen soap opera, spiced up with for a jaded audience of teenagers with attention deficit disorder. I was wrong.

What I discovered was something unexpected: It turned out that the creators of the “O.C.” had pulled one over on the Fox network. They had created a dramedy filled with well-written roles and winning dialogue under the veil of cliched primetime recycled “90210″ plots and predictable, over-used cliffhangers. The actors and the writers of the show had crafted wholly watchable and engaging characters. No matter what else happened on the show, whether it be break-ups, ragers, infidelity, or maguffins, the moments where the players just got a chance to talk and interact with wit and charm, however briefly, made the entire episode worth watching. These moments could then draw you into the ham-fisted drama so you’d give enough of a care to “tune in” next week to find what “major” or “life-changing” moment of the season might occur. In short, the writing made you smitten with the characters and that kept you around past the teaser.

So what’s it about? We’ll start with Peter Gallegher since he has garnered some of the most acclaim that it has been bestowed on the show. This is due to his excellent portrayal of Sandy, the beleaguered patriarch of the Cohen family. He not only has to deal with his adopted son Ryan (played with brooding intensity by Ben McKenzie), a former juvenile delinquent that Sandy took in to try to help him have a future; Seth (played with rapid-fire geek exuberance by Adam Brody), his wayward, anti-social offspring who hates the plastic world of southern California and yearns for acceptance for his nerdness. Sandy’s marriage to Kirsten (Kelly Rowan) involves him in all of the upper class drama of the community due to her coming from the affluent Nichol family. Also, her old high school flame, Jimmy Cooper, and his wife, Julie, are a constant cause of conflict. Marissa Cooper, their daughter, is the love interest of Ryan, while her best friend Summer is Seth’s dream woman. That, in a nutshell, is the “O.C.”

In short, nothing that television hasn’t seen before. Some of the highlights of the interactions between these characters come from the relationship Sandy has with the boys, Seth and Ryan’s dialogues about relationships, Summer and Seth’s relationship ups and downs, and the marriage of Kirsten and Sandy. Everything they go through is to hold the family together. These interactions bring out the best in the writing staff and their ability to craft a scene with banter and
sincere dialogue that may not sound realistic, but is always charming.

But the comic book references? They are aplenty. Ryan and Seth, are actually well-portrayed comic book fans. Seth is rabid “fanboy” who rarely gets respect for his interests while Ryan is a passive aficiado who understands all of the trivia that Seth drops, but would never admit to being as into it as he is. Summer, Seth’s love interest, has not only dressed up as Wonder Woman to try to win his affections, but has also shared a fan-favorite homage to Spider-man with a recreation of the upside-down kiss in the rain scene from the feature film. A previous character on the show, Anna (played by Samaire Armstrong), gave many rants about graphic novels versus comic books and even went so far as to make Seth a comic for Chrismukkah (don’t ask).

Now, I’m just as cultured as the next 20-something, and would never recommend the “O.C.” to anyone seeking quality television. I will, however, say I know why it isn’t the blight on primetime schedules a la “One Tree Hill” or “Smallville”. In their own way, Josh Schwartz, Allen Heinberg, et al and Ryan, Seth, Marissa, Summer, Sandy, Kirsten, Julie, and Jimmy are your corner bar’s drink special. They’re not good for you, and it’s not even something you’d pass along to a friend, but it does make you feel good. When you’re down, it’s an escape that makes you feel a little better. Winning characters have this ability because they’re almost like that acquaintance that always cheers you up.

Personally, I could care less if Ryan and Marissa ever got together or if Seth ever manages to make things work with Summer. These paltry little plot devices disguised as drama are not what makes this a worthwhile hour of TV. The characters, the actors, the dialogue, the sheer charm of the writing; this is what can truly draw you into this show. I’ll continue to watch because just listening to them talk about these “events” is worth the black mark on my record of taste in entertainment.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,